Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:22:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:22:12 -0500 Received: from fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com ([66.185.86.72]:10634 "EHLO fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:22:11 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:06:59 -0500 (EST) From: "Dimitrie O. Paun" X-X-Sender: dimi@dimi.dssd.ca To: Ingo Molnar cc: Jeff Garzik , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Robert Love , Subject: Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.103.156.204] using ID at Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:32:19 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 679 Lines: 18 On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Ingo Molnar wrote: > yes, an ELF flag might work, or my suggestion to allow applications to > increase their priority (up until a certain degree). An ELF flag might be better, as it's declarative -- it allows the kernel to implement 'interactivity' in various ways, so we can keep tweeking it. Priority might prove to be a bit different than interactivity, so we better not overload the two just yet. -- Dimi. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/