Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:40:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:40:44 -0500 Received: from divine.city.tvnet.hu ([195.38.100.154]:52074 "EHLO divine.city.tvnet.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:40:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 20:41:46 +0100 (MET) From: Szakacsits Szabolcs To: "Randy.Dunlap" cc: , , Subject: Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] ntfs OOPS (2.5.63) In-Reply-To: <20030306113942.6f9bbbf5.rddunlap@osdl.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1202 Lines: 33 On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:34:52 +0100 (MET) Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote: > | Anyway, considering how bogus the oops was and Randy already had two > | oops'es before this NTFS one, I think the NTFS driver was a sufferer > | of other trouble(s) than the originator. So unless one can reproduce > | something close to this one (or Randy sends his first [two] oops), I > | would just trash > | > | http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432 > > I must have missed something here. What other 2 oopses are you referring to? Quoting from your report: ==> Mar 1 13:35:44 midway kernel: Oops: 0002 This means oops counter is 2. So there were two oopses before with counter value 0 and 1. > As for closing bug reports because they are not reproducible... No. Not because it's not reproducible however because it's untrustable and bogus. Unless as I mentioned before ... please see above. Thanks! Szaka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/