Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751199AbbLLFfw (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Dec 2015 00:35:52 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:44132 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751017AbbLLFfv (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Dec 2015 00:35:51 -0500 Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 05:35:48 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Diego Viola Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trivial@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net Subject: Re: README Cleanup Project Message-ID: <20151212053548.GO20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1050 Lines: 30 On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 02:46:30AM -0200, Diego Viola wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to do some cleanup on the README, for example, I see it > still mentions LILO in a few places, e.g. > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/README#L256-L258 > > And: > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/README#L295-L317 > > Is this still relevant today? Can I send a patch to remove it from the > README? Any objections? What for? LILO still works just fine here, TYVM. > Could you guys also help me identify other parts in the README that > are not relevant anymore today? > > I understand some people still use LILO but most don't anymore, so I > would like to help keep the README updated to reflect on what the > current standards and needs are. _What_ current standards? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/