Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:25:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:25:51 -0500 Received: from [66.78.32.3] ([66.78.32.3]:16039 "EHLO blacksea.bsdns.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:25:49 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Eric Northup Reply-To: mailing-lists@digitaleric.net To: Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox Subject: Re: HT and idle = poll Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:36:17 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.2 Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Theurer References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200303061736.17181.lkml@digitaleric.net> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - blacksea.bsdns.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - digitaleric.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 809 Lines: 25 On Thursday 06 March 2003 03:08 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On 6 Mar 2003, Alan Cox wrote: > > idle=poll probably needs to be doing "rep nop" in a tight loop. > > We already do that. It's not enough. The HT thing will still steal cycles > continually, since the "rep nop" is really only equivalent to a > "sched_yield()". (Perhaps a naive idea) Right now, there is a single "rep nop" per poll. What happens if you unroll the loop a few times: while (!condition) { cpu_relax(); cpu_relax(); cpu_relax(); } ? I have no HT hardware so can't test this. -Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/