Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:28:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:27:25 -0500 Received: from locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil ([134.207.10.66]:64918 "EHLO locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:26:46 -0500 Message-Id: <200303062336.h26NatGi014423@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> To: Werner Almesberger cc: "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM] make atm (and clip) modular + try_module_get() In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 06 Mar 2003 18:02:09 -0300." <20030306180209.C525@almesberger.net> X-url: http://www.nrl.navy.mil/CCS/people/chas/index.html X-mailer: nmh 1.0 Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 18:36:55 -0500 From: chas williams Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 851 Lines: 15 In message <20030306180209.C525@almesberger.net>,Werner Almesberger writes: >I don't think that would be much of a problem: ATMARP basically >aggregates information, but does very little in terms of actual >state transitions based on ATMARP/InARP messages. And IP doesn't >mind a bit of reordering anyway. (Reconnecting an SVC in the it would be a good idea to preserve the arrival order as much as possible even though some protocols might not be overly sensitive. just handling the list as it appears on the recvq would eliminate the need for skb_migrate and always keep the packets in the right order. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/