Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:40:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:40:37 -0500 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:47833 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:40:36 -0500 Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 15:40:21 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: digitale@digitaleric.net, Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox cc: Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton , rml@tech9.net, mingo@elte.hu, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3 Message-ID: <24000000.1046994021@flay> In-Reply-To: <200303061730.39422.digitale@digitaleric.net> References: <200303061730.39422.digitale@digitaleric.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 865 Lines: 19 > At first I strongly dissaproved of the kernel's timeslice adjustment by > interactivity estimation; policy belongs in userland, I thought. But the That seems to be one of the most dramatically overused misguided statements bandied about in Linux at the moment, with respect to just about every subsystem, and it's really starting to get annoying. Yes, you should be able to frig with policy decisions from userspace, if you really want to BUT the kernel should do something pretty sane by default without user intervention. It's exactly the same mistake apps keep making, and why half of them are unusable. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/