Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752875AbbLNQ0M (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:26:12 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49334 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751199AbbLNQ0J (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:26:09 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] IB/srp: use the new CQ API To: Sagi Grimberg , Christoph Hellwig References: <1449521512-22921-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1449521512-22921-11-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <5669C7AA.4080206@sandisk.com> <20151211142220.GB20201@lst.de> <566B0EE5.8080602@redhat.com> <20151212080833.GA32638@infradead.org> <566D47EC.3000000@dev.mellanox.co.il> Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Bart Van Assche , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, axboe@fb.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Doug Ledford Openpgp: id=AE6B1BDA122B23B4265B1274B826A3330E572FDD; url=pgp.mit.edu Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Message-ID: <566EEDA0.203@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:26:08 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <566D47EC.3000000@dev.mellanox.co.il> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="woAFES8JS3ueHkgLljeVPGQsQPQbMDplG" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2597 Lines: 64 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --woAFES8JS3ueHkgLljeVPGQsQPQbMDplG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/13/2015 05:26 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote: >=20 >> Allright. How do you want to proceed? The current rdma-cq branch >> has all kinds of dependencies, but I've also prepared a new rdma-cq.2 >> branch that could go straight on top of your current queue: >> >> http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/rdma.git/shortlog/refs/heads/rdma-c= q.2 >> >> If you're ready to start the 4.5 tree I can send those out as a patch >> series. >=20 > Will this get on top of iser-remote-inv? Or should I resend atop of thi= s? I'm going through my inbox right now. I expect somewhere in there Or will make his case for why he doesn't like Christoph's patch to get rid of the attr struct. I'll listen, and if I'm not convinced, I'll take that patchset first and this one second. (I reviewed the patchset already....aside from the fact that I *like* having the attr struct elements in an organized sub-struct, it's fine and it definitely improves on all of those query calls). --=20 Doug Ledford GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD --woAFES8JS3ueHkgLljeVPGQsQPQbMDplG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWbu2gAAoJELgmozMOVy/dWEkQAJgaW67D8ZAMdnP/02niP9K6 gmbpdwpxSShj7/oM5ZN9NtbxMDumoodsb1D+6CFxl7VxANtj3QGjA13bCSbZR0Zk 9U/JOJ0HJI75R02pz/G6d7wePVNEU00Vwuc1/eGkNyPwWMHWjzjbF3bJSxklBYdN kTOZF/o2dneGLAXKEp5OYyTPc1HVd5raHSPJ1pNSWTFMLE4PQSIjY9uoBir4LdDO TtINjsM9Izwlr53JeWqXd1t+UDThMSQxW7d44ANu/NEFAjJ7hjj1xOfH3v28ENV7 pBp5hmfwTNhegRzt67XbOPdvce+KSEbdwGeWpp97GKjAc41BGQVDSBRNdRL5oK5K 7M3fwZCxtYwIfOYt5d3ZqzySZoIGxr6NKxtHrNAyXewHzhhveKdxcUEJ+MbDgQeF J9bJucUo+QTlp44Ebui2XfabUR6KAcn9ZfmVsvRke9u6ciWUz5+xAhJ5cCRCCvwW pZbqK0+1OCKvus2lPMmuL56i7xt5fYikGrHgSpDHmZz3jZYvUBAMHbKW04aiB7h9 vAJksxNOaSq8OCGj4WED5ZdDJJ2lf4JBiQDq2QmfF0Ylcb8HjdC44uaCaTuxrI1L VVMh0cdc5n1Ys0Jq0RNSMIHxcjrAjXrOQ4lW0S2SQr7af4+qZ6eT9wEgQwJ6r+ZP VfMLHb1rrvAgBmJf4nbb =anU5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --woAFES8JS3ueHkgLljeVPGQsQPQbMDplG-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/