Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753172AbbLNRyu (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:54:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37867 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752601AbbLNRyt (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:54:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:55:09 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: yalin wang , akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com, mhocko@suse.com, kwapulinski.piotr@gmail.com, aarcange@redhat.com, dcashman@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] mm: change find_vma() function Message-ID: <20151214175509.GA25681@redhat.com> References: <1450090945-4020-1-git-send-email-yalin.wang2010@gmail.com> <20151214121107.GB4201@node.shutemov.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151214121107.GB4201@node.shutemov.name> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1426 Lines: 44 On 12/14, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 07:02:25PM +0800, yalin wang wrote: > > change find_vma() to break ealier when found the adderss > > is not in any vma, don't need loop to search all vma. > > > > Signed-off-by: yalin wang > > --- > > mm/mmap.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c > > index b513f20..8294c9b 100644 > > --- a/mm/mmap.c > > +++ b/mm/mmap.c > > @@ -2064,6 +2064,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct *find_vma(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr) > > vma = tmp; > > if (tmp->vm_start <= addr) > > break; > > + if (!tmp->vm_prev || tmp->vm_prev->vm_end <= addr) > > + break; > > + > > This 'break' would return 'tmp' as found vma. But this would be right? Not that I think this optimization makes sense, I simply do not know, but to me this change looks technically correct at first glance... But the changelog is wrong or I missed something. This change can stop the main loop earlier; if "tmp" is the first vma, or if the previous one is below the address. Or perhaps I just misread that "not in any vma" note in the changelog. No? Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/