Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932472AbbLNTGQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:06:16 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:29120 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932449AbbLNTGL (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:06:11 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,428,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="873444567" Subject: [PATCH 16/32] x86, mm: simplify get_user_pages() PTE bit handling To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen , dave.hansen@linux.intel.com From: Dave Hansen Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:06:10 -0800 References: <20151214190542.39C4886D@viggo.jf.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20151214190542.39C4886D@viggo.jf.intel.com> Message-Id: <20151214190610.FBAB486D@viggo.jf.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3238 Lines: 107 From: Dave Hansen The current get_user_pages() code is a wee bit more complicated than it needs to be for pte bit checking. Currently, it establishes a mask of required pte _PAGE_* bits and ensures that the pte it goes after has all those bits. This consolidates the three identical copies of this code. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen --- b/arch/x86/mm/gup.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff -puN arch/x86/mm/gup.c~pkeys-12-gup-swizzle arch/x86/mm/gup.c --- a/arch/x86/mm/gup.c~pkeys-12-gup-swizzle 2015-12-14 10:42:45.691932481 -0800 +++ b/arch/x86/mm/gup.c 2015-12-14 10:42:45.694932616 -0800 @@ -64,6 +64,24 @@ retry: } /* + * 'pteval' can come from a pte, pmd or pud. We only check + * _PAGE_PRESENT, _PAGE_USER, and _PAGE_RW in here which are the + * same value on all 3 types. + */ +static inline int pte_allows_gup(unsigned long pteval, int write) +{ + unsigned long need_pte_bits = _PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_USER; + + if (write) + need_pte_bits |= _PAGE_RW; + + if ((pteval & need_pte_bits) != need_pte_bits) + return 0; + + return 1; +} + +/* * The performance critical leaf functions are made noinline otherwise gcc * inlines everything into a single function which results in too much * register pressure. @@ -71,13 +89,8 @@ retry: static noinline int gup_pte_range(pmd_t pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, int write, struct page **pages, int *nr) { - unsigned long mask; pte_t *ptep; - mask = _PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_USER; - if (write) - mask |= _PAGE_RW; - ptep = pte_offset_map(&pmd, addr); do { pte_t pte = gup_get_pte(ptep); @@ -88,8 +101,8 @@ static noinline int gup_pte_range(pmd_t pte_unmap(ptep); return 0; } - - if ((pte_flags(pte) & (mask | _PAGE_SPECIAL)) != mask) { + if (!pte_allows_gup(pte_val(pte), write) || + pte_special(pte)) { pte_unmap(ptep); return 0; } @@ -117,14 +130,10 @@ static inline void get_head_page_multipl static noinline int gup_huge_pmd(pmd_t pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, int write, struct page **pages, int *nr) { - unsigned long mask; struct page *head, *page; int refs; - mask = _PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_USER; - if (write) - mask |= _PAGE_RW; - if ((pmd_flags(pmd) & mask) != mask) + if (!pte_allows_gup(pmd_val(pmd), write)) return 0; /* hugepages are never "special" */ VM_BUG_ON(pmd_flags(pmd) & _PAGE_SPECIAL); @@ -193,14 +202,10 @@ static int gup_pmd_range(pud_t pud, unsi static noinline int gup_huge_pud(pud_t pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, int write, struct page **pages, int *nr) { - unsigned long mask; struct page *head, *page; int refs; - mask = _PAGE_PRESENT|_PAGE_USER; - if (write) - mask |= _PAGE_RW; - if ((pud_flags(pud) & mask) != mask) + if (!pte_allows_gup(pud_val(pud), write)) return 0; /* hugepages are never "special" */ VM_BUG_ON(pud_flags(pud) & _PAGE_SPECIAL); _ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/