Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261380AbTCGFwH>; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 00:52:07 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261381AbTCGFwG>; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 00:52:06 -0500
Received: from msp-24-163-212-250.mn.rr.com ([24.163.212.250]:129 "EHLO
	localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261380AbTCGFwE>; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 00:52:04 -0500
Subject: Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3
From: Shawn <core@enodev.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303070653050.2873-100000@localhost.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303070653050.2873-100000@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1047016495.3640.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 
Date: 06 Mar 2003 23:54:55 -0600
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 688
Lines: 14

On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 23:57, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> so the correct approach is both to make X more interactive (your patch),
> _and_ to make the compilation jobs less interactive (my patch). This is
> that explains why Andrew saw roughly similar interactivity with you and my
> patch applied separately, but the best result was when the combo patch was
> applied. Agreed?

Even better, can you point me to where this "combo" patch can be found?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/