Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932932AbbLOBtc (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:49:32 -0500 Received: from mailout4.samsung.com ([203.254.224.34]:55058 "EHLO mailout4.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932400AbbLOBtb (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:49:31 -0500 X-AuditID: cbfee61b-f793c6d00000236c-7d-566f71a884db From: Chao Yu To: "'Jaegeuk Kim'" Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <03bb01d133eb$5628a350$0279e9f0$@samsung.com> <20151215005538.GA57132@jaegeuk.local> In-reply-to: <20151215005538.GA57132@jaegeuk.local> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: do more integrity verification for superblock Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 09:48:37 +0800 Message-id: <00ea01d136da$d533d790$7f9b86b0$@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-index: AQFk8MqmQooJof8lgXwps/5Rtw7rTgNRhCPNn4lC1eA= Content-language: zh-cn X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t9jAd0VhflhBpuOmFs8WT+L2eLSIneL y7vmsDkwe2xa1cnmsXvBZyaPz5vkApijuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDLWzXjEXvBev6KteT17A+Mz 1S5GTg4JAROJg/ffMUHYYhIX7q1n62Lk4hASWMoosezdfhYI5xWjxK0NS9lAqtgEVCSWd/wH 6xARUJPo3TcFzGYW8JBo7PjOCmILCSRJHJvTBxbnFDCW6Fp3DMwWFvCRmDPtFCOIzSKgKnGx 9TcLiM0rYCnRvaGXCcIWlPgx+R4LxEwtifU7j0PNl5fYvOYtM8SlChI7zr5mhLjBSqL92FGo GnGJjUdusUxgFJqFZNQsJKNmIRk1C0nLAkaWVYwSqQXJBcVJ6blGeanlesWJucWleel6yfm5 mxjBYf9Megfj4V3uhxgFOBiVeHh/sOaHCbEmlhVX5h5ilOBgVhLhLbYACvGmJFZWpRblxxeV 5qQWH2KU5mBREufddykyTEggPbEkNTs1tSC1CCbLxMEp1cBoxlO98uOM7LqmaLs2Ud/zHS5m 9Vc/F/+axtMXM//eg8Kso0pFSzZ576zer8+ybpZ227wrH/eUB4c+d/8y6deRHu+C5H1+tqVF SS+k1uS/bXxvMN+g+YCkPW/Ewhbl/7Oyrj+zs125TP7fid8rBRzTI9ty1uoz7qtV/W/Lsm6H UkfgGo7XD88rsRRnJBpqMRcVJwIAM3D6BHcCAAA= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 6197 Lines: 180 Hi Jaegeuk, > -----Original Message----- > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org] > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 8:56 AM > To: Chao Yu > Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: do more integrity verification for superblock > > Hi Chao, > > I also got superblock failure. > It seems that your patch doesn't handle correctly if segment0_blkaddr is not > zero. > Please see below. > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 04:09:23PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > > Do more sanity check for superblock during ->mount. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > > --- > > fs/f2fs/super.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c > > index 5434186..624fc2c 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c > > @@ -926,6 +926,79 @@ static loff_t max_file_size(unsigned bits) > > return result; > > } > > > > +static inline bool sanity_check_area_boundary(struct super_block *sb, > > + struct f2fs_super_block *raw_super) > > +{ > > + u32 segment0_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment0_blkaddr); > > + u32 cp_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->cp_blkaddr); > > + u32 sit_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->sit_blkaddr); > > + u32 nat_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->nat_blkaddr); > > + u32 ssa_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->ssa_blkaddr); > > + u32 main_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->main_blkaddr); > > + u32 segment_count_ckpt = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count_ckpt); > > + u32 segment_count_sit = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count_sit); > > + u32 segment_count_nat = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count_nat); > > + u32 segment_count_ssa = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count_ssa); > > + u32 segment_count_main = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count_main); > > + u32 segment_count = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count); > > + u32 log_blocks_per_seg = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_blocks_per_seg); > > + > > + if (segment0_blkaddr != cp_blkaddr) { > > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, > > + "Mismatch start address, segment0(%u) cp_blkaddr(%u)", > > + segment0_blkaddr, cp_blkaddr); > > + return true; > > + } > > + > > + if (cp_blkaddr + (segment_count_ckpt << log_blocks_per_seg) != > > + sit_blkaddr) { > > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, > > + "Wrong CP boundary, start(%u) end(%u) blocks(%u)", > > + cp_blkaddr, sit_blkaddr, > > + segment_count_ckpt << log_blocks_per_seg); > > + return true; > > + } > > + > > + if (sit_blkaddr + (segment_count_sit << log_blocks_per_seg) != > > + nat_blkaddr) { > > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, > > + "Wrong SIT boundary, start(%u) end(%u) blocks(%u)", > > + sit_blkaddr, nat_blkaddr, > > + segment_count_sit << log_blocks_per_seg); > > + return true; > > + } > > + > > + if (nat_blkaddr + (segment_count_nat << log_blocks_per_seg) != > > + ssa_blkaddr) { > > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, > > + "Wrong NAT boundary, start(%u) end(%u) blocks(%u)", > > + nat_blkaddr, ssa_blkaddr, > > + segment_count_nat << log_blocks_per_seg); > > + return true; > > + } > > + > > + if (ssa_blkaddr + (segment_count_ssa << log_blocks_per_seg) != > > + main_blkaddr) { > > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, > > + "Wrong SSA boundary, start(%u) end(%u) blocks(%u)", > > + ssa_blkaddr, main_blkaddr, > > + segment_count_ssa << log_blocks_per_seg); > > + return true; > > + } > > + > > + if (main_blkaddr + (segment_count_main << log_blocks_per_seg) != > > + (segment_count + 1) << log_blocks_per_seg) { Oh, zone aligned start offset 'segment0_blkaddr' was calculated based on zone size, sector size, total sectors. So here it's wrong to use constant '1'. Sorry for my mistake. Thanks for your explanation below! :) I will resend the v2 patch. Thanks, > > This should be > segment_count << log_blocks_per_seg + segment0_blkaddr) { > > > ========================================================================= > '- main_blkaddr > `- segment0_blkaddr > |-------------- segment_count_main ----------| > > |-------------------------- segment_count --------------------------| > > > Thanks, > > > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, > > + "Wrong MAIN_AREA boundary, start(%u) end(%u) blocks(%u)", > > + main_blkaddr, > > + (segment_count + 1) << log_blocks_per_seg, > > + segment_count_main << log_blocks_per_seg); > > + return true; > > + } > > + > > + return false; > > +} > > + > > static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct super_block *sb, > > struct f2fs_super_block *raw_super) > > { > > @@ -955,6 +1028,14 @@ static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct super_block *sb, > > return 1; > > } > > > > + /* check log blocks per segment */ > > + if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_blocks_per_seg) != 9) { > > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, > > + "Invalid log blocks per segment (%u)\n", > > + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_blocks_per_seg)); > > + return 1; > > + } > > + > > /* Currently, support 512/1024/2048/4096 bytes sector size */ > > if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_sectorsize) > > > F2FS_MAX_LOG_SECTOR_SIZE || > > @@ -973,6 +1054,23 @@ static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct super_block *sb, > > le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_sectorsize)); > > return 1; > > } > > + > > + /* check reserved ino info */ > > + if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->node_ino) != 1 || > > + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->meta_ino) != 2 || > > + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->root_ino) != 3) { > > + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, > > + "Invalid Fs Meta Ino: node(%u) meta(%u) root(%u)", > > + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->node_ino), > > + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->meta_ino), > > + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->root_ino)); > > + return 1; > > + } > > + > > + /* check CP/SIT/NAT/SSA/MAIN_AREA area boundary */ > > + if (sanity_check_area_boundary(sb, raw_super)) > > + return 1; > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > -- > > 2.6.3 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/