Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:04:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:04:24 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com ([204.127.198.38]:5072 "EHLO rwcrmhc51.attbi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:04:19 -0500 Message-ID: <3E684737.7080704@kegel.com> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 23:16:07 -0800 From: Dan Kegel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030211 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Those ruddy punctuation fixes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1250 Lines: 35 The current hubub was caused by a build breakage, right? And that build breakage was caused by a spellfix outside of a comment. Simple rules to avoid that problem: 1. don't fix anything not in a comment. (spell-fix.pl doesn't.) 2. build after you fix 3. don't fix any comments in code you can't build 4. don't fix any punctuation at all The earlier hubub was caused by people worried about improper fixes (removing puns, changing meaning, etc.) The simple expedient of having several literate people (sensitized to all the concerns raised in this thread) review the change should get rid of most of that risk. So I don't think the spelling police have to beat a total retreat. They just have to follow the above rules of thumb. Or is the hubub really about something else? Like people just hate the whole idea, and wish it would go away, and don't really want to discuss it rationally? - Dan -- Dan Kegel http://www.kegel.com http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/