Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965567AbbLOPle (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:41:34 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.135]:51518 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965474AbbLOPl3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:41:29 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Timur Tabi Cc: Christopher Covington , Florian Fainelli , Gilad Avidov , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, sdharia@codeaurora.org, shankerd@codeaurora.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, vikrams@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: emac: emac gigabit ethernet controller driver Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 16:41:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1579270.z2ZaCA4LQo@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <56702EEC.8000506@codeaurora.org> References: <1450138740-32562-1-git-send-email-gavidov@codeaurora.org> <1594472.ixZvj6PYdz@wuerfel> <56702EEC.8000506@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:51O0PxVURSzXjzKbqpC9RiIr3VAHZifSYFmYwt8FY6DA3nj2nPG mBMzyixa0KOJTXI4jm4AUl7m6suKHfIi3wjkNGCaiCK1BFyvc3N7plZanM6CsnzYejr/uSt RwT+rN5KmHFxPzFqZ6WkKiHX3IlGYoXHP3CfSu5Dz3ZOub7Wd5eVpTK4c/xb2Hw1xOCLCgY xglVyLfnjDvnAzazXSyyA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:xHre5m2h5n0=:4ZcmSvzOL9fMT5RHLv6vuU mDT0jO0A/vPkVua/0/USVUMTeO6CtDOKc2uYtou517xR9HmScVZ6b6EwTtmJjGrA4/lldBWZX tlWKCr6ATViA6WCdQxqcy/8IYdbSSZgKjJ/sWoXuY0oSZR0UuZC+Xjs+G0Huu4Y1Wbi4ADu23 SWAlW8Soiannk0uLLvj2hvtxDyVc8CctfKIhi0ptrUfqxx8TnaZjyp0hPIttCp+KJBVcdMTth Lt1AJ1ecDafbGvKxdqtWQ51tFR0asiA9Tase4rxbzcihUnVf1GeH3I1z81AxSYdfWrMRCJuXI nIO0aB/uysKhIMbaq2sY1/YX6Uh5LWAd6vNmg6qmEcbtuTpWTvqV2kifRK5eP47GsTyabih3g Zt66mhkrovq39v8WdmlDl2q1Pymsls4A5swvmUwYNKQbmnXcm8ACPQhF1P+/3BCzVPaWYmGmV /mzghzA7mcx/8nk/QofVTpUsYI3bjkvjAHhqy/g14jw735xp2B3OvgL70k/ESfUeCyhWqahno eXB467QtJ6/ejUqpDKYS9XF258SJBR4iz6WDdiPgs3eyBASDwcgDMLsOVjotqQ5xqgeY+4IQN Pmd0TPhIua005z1BfXexbFrNx+HkM8E6LBrztjJCiXgXn14W0FmsZW1O/LEBppvOgCeU/0FcG IxeWSvEHagW2WWBbk28MB4dVp9kxgKf2vC2m2cfVRh7CtdBAyOhGoyt1Fb6HbvdGkSEUBYgl3 d9y4T7FXMOgo9rWg Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1039 Lines: 25 On Tuesday 15 December 2015 09:17:00 Timur Tabi wrote: > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > We generally want to use readl/writel rather than the relaxed versions, > > unless it is in performance-critical code. > > What about if we have 20+ writes in a row, for example, when > initializing a part? I've seen code like this: > > writel_relaxed(...); > writel_relaxed(...); > writel_relaxed(...); > ... > writel(...); // HW now inited, so enable If that's in the probe() called from it function, just use writel() everywhere, a few extra microseconds won't kill the boot time. In general, if a user would notice the difference, use the relaxed version and add a comment to explain how you proved it's correct, otherwise stay with the default accessors. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/