Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:54:01 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Cc: wsa@the-dreams.de, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Add support for AMD Seattle I2C
Message-ID: <20151216145401.GX1762@lahna.fi.intel.com>
References: <1450216553-5641-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
 <5670C90A.5020305@amd.com>
 <20151216091652.GN1762@lahna.fi.intel.com>
 <56717552.4060203@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56717552.4060203@amd.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2522
Lines: 69

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 08:29:38AM -0600, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/16/2015 03:16 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:14:34PM -0600, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> >>Hi Mika,
> >>
> >>On 12/15/15 15:55, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> >>>Add device HID AMDI0510 to match the I2C controlers on AMD Seattle platform
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> >>>---
> >>>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 1 +
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>>
> >>>diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> >>>index 57f623b..a027154 100644
> >>>--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> >>>+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> >>>@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id dw_i2c_acpi_match[] = {
> >>>  	{ "80860F41", 0 },
> >>>  	{ "808622C1", 0 },
> >>>  	{ "AMD0010", 0 },
> >>>+	{ "AMDI0510", 0 },
> >>>  	{ }
> >>
> >>Since this driver seems to be used by several SOCs, and we have been adding
> >>the HID from various SOC vendors. Do you think it would be better to assign
> >>a CID so that each SOC vendor can specify in their ACPI DSDT and we can
> >>match them here?
> >
> >Sure _CID would work here.
> 
> Do you know if Synopsys has already provided a CID that we can use for this?

No.

> If not, who do you think should provide this? 

Why can't you make _CID for AMD part only? For Intel we are going to get
new IDs for every major SoC release no matter what.

> Also, do you think the FMCN
> and SSCN should be documented somewhere in the spec so that FW and OSes can
> agree upon going forward?

Since this is designware I2C specific thing it should not be part of the
ACPI spec, I think.

But, yes I agree should be documented *somewhere* ;-)

> >>Then, we can also associate the FMCN and SSCN along with the CID, and
> >>guarantee compatibility.
> >
> >Well, the driver checks those everytime it finds that the device has
> >ACPI companion regardless of _HID/_CID.
> 
> Not sure what you mean by "device has ACPI companion". Do you mean the
> driver check those for every matched devices here?

That's right:

	if (has_acpi_companion(&pdev->dev))
		dw_i2c_acpi_configure(pdev);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/