Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:33:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:33:09 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([63.209.29.3]:29834 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:33:08 -0500 Message-ID: <3E68A1F3.2020006@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 05:43:15 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Zippel CC: Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 References: <20030307001655.GB13766@kroah.com> <3E67F03F.2070902@zytor.com> <3E67F76E.4050709@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 639 Lines: 18 Roman Zippel wrote: > > You are avoiding my question. If something goes into the kernel, the > kernel license would be the obvious choice. Granting additional rights or > using a dual license is a relatively small problem. But you must certainly > have a reason to choose a completely different license? > I gave my reason. You chose not to accept it, but that's not my problem. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/