Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934610AbbLPSL0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:11:26 -0500 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:50087 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934237AbbLPSLS (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:11:18 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: ina2xx: add support for TI INA2xx Power Monitors To: Marc Titinger , , , , , , References: <1449479375-4061-1-git-send-email-mtitinger@baylibre.com> <1449479375-4061-2-git-send-email-mtitinger@baylibre.com> <5671A329.1040306@ti.com> <5671A564.30900@baylibre.com> CC: , , From: "Andrew F. Davis" Message-ID: <5671A8BE.7080903@ti.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:09:02 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5671A564.30900@baylibre.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4330 Lines: 124 On 12/16/2015 11:54 AM, Marc Titinger wrote: > On 16/12/2015 18:45, Andrew F. Davis wrote: >> On 12/07/2015 03:09 AM, Marc Titinger wrote: >>> +#define INA2XX_CHAN(_type, _index, _address) { \ >>> + .type = (_type), \ >>> + .address = (_address), \ >>> + .indexed = 1, \ >>> + .channel = (_index), \ >>> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW), \ >>> + .info_mask_shared_by_dir = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ) | \ >>> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO), \ >>> + .scan_index = (_index), \ >>> + .scan_type = { \ >>> + .sign = 'u', \ >>> + .realbits = 16, \ >>> + .storagebits = 16, \ >>> + .endianness = IIO_BE, \ >> >> ^^^^ See below. >> >>> + } \ >>> +} >>> + >>> +/* >>> + * Sampling Freq is a consequence of the integration times of >>> + * the Voltage channels. >>> + */ >>> +#define INA2XX_CHAN_VOLTAGE(_index, _address) { \ >>> + .type = IIO_VOLTAGE, \ >>> + .address = (_address), \ >>> + .indexed = 1, \ >>> + .channel = (_index), \ >>> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | \ >>> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME), \ >>> + .scan_index = (_index), \ >>> + .scan_type = { \ >>> + .sign = 'u', \ >>> + .realbits = 16, \ >>> + .storagebits = 16, \ >>> + .endianness = IIO_BE, \ >>> + } \ >>> +} >>> + >>> +static const struct iio_chan_spec ina2xx_channels[] = { >>> + INA2XX_CHAN_VOLTAGE(0, INA2XX_SHUNT_VOLTAGE), >>> + INA2XX_CHAN_VOLTAGE(1, INA2XX_BUS_VOLTAGE), >>> + INA2XX_CHAN(IIO_CURRENT, 2, INA2XX_CURRENT), >>> + INA2XX_CHAN(IIO_POWER, 3, INA2XX_POWER), >>> + IIO_CHAN_SOFT_TIMESTAMP(4), >>> +}; >>> + >>> +static int ina2xx_work_buffer(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) >>> +{ >>> + struct ina2xx_chip_info *chip = iio_priv(indio_dev); >>> + unsigned short data[8]; >>> + int bit, ret, i = 0; >>> + unsigned long buffer_us, elapsed_us; >>> + s64 time_a, time_b; >>> + unsigned int alert; >>> + >>> + time_a = iio_get_time_ns(); >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * Because the timer thread and the chip conversion clock >>> + * are asynchronous, the period difference will eventually >>> + * result in reading V[k-1] again, or skip V[k] at time Tk. >>> + * In order to resync the timer with the conversion process >>> + * we check the ConVersionReadyFlag. >>> + * On hardware that supports using the ALERT pin to toggle a >>> + * GPIO a triggered buffer could be used instead. >>> + * For now, we pay for that extra read of the ALERT register >>> + */ >>> + do { >>> + ret = regmap_read(chip->regmap, INA226_ALERT_MASK, >>> + &alert); >>> + if (ret < 0) >>> + return ret; >>> + >>> + alert &= INA266_CVRF; >>> + trace_printk("Conversion ready: %d\n", !!alert); >>> + >>> + } while (!alert); >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * Single register reads: bulk_read will not work with ina226 >>> + * as there is no auto-increment of the address register for >>> + * data length longer than 16bits. >>> + */ >>> + for_each_set_bit(bit, indio_dev->active_scan_mask, >>> + indio_dev->masklength) { >>> + unsigned int val; >>> + >>> + ret = regmap_read(chip->regmap, >>> + INA2XX_SHUNT_VOLTAGE + bit, &val); >>> + if (ret < 0) >>> + return ret; >>> + >>> + data[i++] = val; >> >> The read above seems to fill the buffer in CPU order, but above >> IIO_BE is specified, this should probably be IIO_CPU to avoid >> confusion for programs that check for IIO buffer endianness. > > Hi Andrew, > > Well spotted. I'm sorry it is getting a bit messy because I posted a fix for this in a separate patch (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/12/131) > Ah, wasn't following that. > Using IIO_CPU seems an even better option, I did not know about this value and used IIO_LE. > Which will give incorrect results on BE systems, I'll wait till the dust settles for this driver and push some more small fixups a bit later. > Thanks! > Marc. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/