Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753799AbbLQGiy (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 01:38:54 -0500 Received: from mail.bmw-carit.de ([62.245.222.98]:47234 "EHLO mail.bmw-carit.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750754AbbLQGix (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 01:38:53 -0500 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0C0205.5672586F.00AD,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] bpf samples: Uses libbpf in tools/lib to do BPF operations To: Wang Nan , , , , , , , , , , , References: <1450329794-161948-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> CC: , From: Daniel Wagner Message-ID: <56725868.6080902@bmw-carit.de> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 07:38:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1450329794-161948-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 889 Lines: 29 Hi, On 12/17/2015 06:23 AM, Wang Nan wrote: > Since we already have libbpf in tools/lib, we don't need to maintain > another bpf loader and operations library in samples/bpf. > > In patchset: > > Patch 1/10 - 7/10 improves libbpf, add missing features to support > samples, > > Patch 8/10 adds utils.[ch], which creates similar API like old > bpf_load.c and libbpf.c. > > Patch 9/10 replace all sampels to use API provides by utils.[ch] and > libbpf. > > Patch 10/10 removes unneeded files. Which tree did you use for your patches? I tried to apply them against mainline and net-next which didn't really work out. cheers, daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/