Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754831AbbLQG5f (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 01:57:35 -0500 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.66]:16947 "EHLO szxga03-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752917AbbLQG5e (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 01:57:34 -0500 Message-ID: <56725B67.2010309@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:51:19 +0800 From: "Wangnan (F)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Wagner , , , , , , , , , , , CC: , Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] bpf samples: Uses libbpf in tools/lib to do BPF operations References: <1450329794-161948-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> <56725868.6080902@bmw-carit.de> In-Reply-To: <56725868.6080902@bmw-carit.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.111.66.109] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.56725B86.00BC,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-05-26 15:14:31, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 58296bd2132d0824238b0c68449bc137 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1104 Lines: 40 On 2015/12/17 14:38, Daniel Wagner wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/17/2015 06:23 AM, Wang Nan wrote: >> Since we already have libbpf in tools/lib, we don't need to maintain >> another bpf loader and operations library in samples/bpf. >> >> In patchset: >> >> Patch 1/10 - 7/10 improves libbpf, add missing features to support >> samples, >> >> Patch 8/10 adds utils.[ch], which creates similar API like old >> bpf_load.c and libbpf.c. >> >> Patch 9/10 replace all sampels to use API provides by utils.[ch] and >> libbpf. >> >> Patch 10/10 removes unneeded files. > Which tree did you use for your patches? I tried to apply them against > mainline and net-next which didn't really work out. These patches based on Arnaldo's 'perf/core' because of those libbpf changes. Which tree is the right one for this? net-next? Thank you. > cheers, > daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/