Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755952AbbLQJ6t (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:58:49 -0500 Received: from mail-bl2nam02on0057.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.38.57]:9757 "EHLO NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932318AbbLQJ6o (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:58:44 -0500 Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 149.199.60.83) smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; ettus.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ettus.com; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=xilinx.com; Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 02:00:00 -0800 From: =?utf-8?B?U8O2cmVu?= Brinkmann To: Peter Hurley CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Michal Simek , , , , Moritz Fischer Subject: Re: [PATCH LINUX v4 06/13] tty: xuartps: Move request_irq to after setting up the HW Message-ID: <20151217100000.GO3358@xsjsorenbubuntu> References: <1449376769-13369-1-git-send-email-soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> <1449376769-13369-7-git-send-email-soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> <5669F172.6020503@hurleysoftware.com> <20151215154136.GU3358@xsjsorenbubuntu> <5670A1B6.6050708@hurleysoftware.com> <20151216090339.GX3358@xsjsorenbubuntu> <56717745.3060306@hurleysoftware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <56717745.3060306@hurleysoftware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-RCIS-Action: ALLOW X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1224-8.0.0.1202-22006.005 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes;Yes X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:149.199.60.83;CTRY:US;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(2980300002)(438002)(164054003)(377454003)(377424004)(24454002)(479174004)(189002)(199003)(11100500001)(63266004)(54356999)(106466001)(6806005)(1220700001)(86362001)(87936001)(5008740100001)(57986006)(47776003)(1076002)(1096002)(76176999)(36386004)(50986999)(2950100001)(81156007)(33656002)(50466002)(92566002)(4001150100001)(4001350100001)(83506001)(23676002)(586003)(33716001)(85182001)(189998001)(77096005)(76506005)(85202003)(93886004)(5001960100002)(110136002)(107986001)(217873001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:CY1NAM02HT190;H:xsj-pvapsmtpgw01;FPR:;SPF:Pass;PTR:unknown-60-83.xilinx.com;MX:1;A:1;LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(8251501001);SRVR:CY1NAM02HT190; X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <985d06a090fe476bb5a7722ac3db58bf@CY1NAM02HT190.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com> X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(520078)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046);SRVR:CY1NAM02HT190;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1NAM02HT190; X-Forefront-PRVS: 07935ACF08 X-OriginatorOrg: xilinx.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Dec 2015 09:58:40.3270 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c;Ip=[149.199.60.83];Helo=[xsj-pvapsmtpgw01] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1NAM02HT190 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1944 Lines: 43 On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 06:37AM -0800, Peter Hurley wrote: > On 12/16/2015 01:03 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 03:26PM -0800, Peter Hurley wrote: > >> On 12/15/2015 07:41 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 01:41PM -0800, Peter Hurley wrote: > >>>> On 12/05/2015 08:39 PM, Soren Brinkmann wrote: > >>>>> Request_irq() should be _after_ h/w programming, otherwise an > >>>>> interrupt could be triggered and in-progress before the h/w has been > >>>>> setup. > >>>> > >>>> Slight misunderstanding. My fault; I should have been more explicit. > >>>> > >>>> 1. Any setup necessary for the isr not to be confused and misdirect spurious > >>>> interrupts (or hang) should be before installing the isr with request_irq() > >>>> None of this code should trigger an interrupt. > >>>> 2. Clear pending interrupts > >>>> 3. Install the isr with request_irq() > >>>> 4. Enable interrupts > >>> > >>> Isn't that what the startup function is doing now - more or less. I > >>> think 3 and 4 are swapped to release the lock and then do the > >>> request_irq, but I believe that should be OK. > >>> The startup function configures the HW. Clears the ISR. Enables the > >>> intended IRQs and then does the request_irq call. > >> > >> If the driver enables interrupts before installing the isr with request_irq() > >> and an interrupt occurs there will the no handler to catch it and EOI the > >> device. > > > > Really? Shouldn't the IRQ be masked in the interrupt controller until > > everything is in place? > > Sorry, I'm used to shared interrupts, where that isn't the case. Ahh, I didn't have to deal with such cases yet. Makes sense though. Thanks, Sören -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/