Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261691AbTCGSH0>; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:07:26 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261703AbTCGSH0>; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:07:26 -0500
Received: from pop017pub.verizon.net ([206.46.170.210]:34505 "EHLO
	pop017.verizon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261691AbTCGSHY>; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:07:24 -0500
Message-ID: <3E68E28A.80600@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 13:18:50 -0500
From: Stephen Wille Padnos <stephen.willepadnos@verizon.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WimMark I for 2.5.64
References: <20030307175620.GZ2835@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030307175620.GZ2835@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at pop017.verizon.net from [64.223.82.122] at Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:17:54 -0600
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 586
Lines: 18

Interesting, but a couple of questions:
Which arbitrary kernel scores 1000.0?
Is the score very consistent on that kernel and machine?  (what kind of 
max/min scores do you get?)

- Steve

Joel Becker wrote:

>kernel changes.  The benchmark is normalized an arbitrary kernel, which
>scores 1000.0.  All other numbers are relative to this.
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/