Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756598AbbLQLbe (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 06:31:34 -0500 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([59.151.112.132]:40535 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756577AbbLQLbd (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 06:31:33 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,346,1444665600"; d="scan'208";a="1692436" Message-ID: <56729B3D.1040502@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 19:23:41 +0800 From: Dongsheng Yang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , "Eric W. Biederman" CC: LKML , Subject: [Propose] Isolate core_pattern in mnt namespace. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.66] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 1F1FB4092556.A66E4 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 521 Lines: 16 Hi guys, We are working on making core dump behaviour isolated in container. But the problem is, the /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern is a kernel wide setting, not belongs to a container. So we want to add core_pattern into mnt namespace. What do you think about it? Yang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/