Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966705AbbLQOfD (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:35:03 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40355 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934373AbbLQOfB (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:35:01 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:34:57 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Jason Wang , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Duyck Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: use smp_store_mb Message-ID: <20151217163412-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <1450347932-16325-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20151217112222.GC6375@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20151217151705-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20151217140212.GB6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151217140212.GB6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1296 Lines: 32 On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 03:02:12PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 03:26:29PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Note that virtio_mb() is weirdly inconsistent with virtio_[rw]mb() in > > > that they use dma_* ops for weak_barriers, while virtio_mb() uses > > > smp_mb(). > > > > It's a hack really. I think I'll clean it up a bit to > > make it more consistent. > > > > To simplify things, you may consider things before > > the optimization brought in by > > commit 9e1a27ea42691429e31f158cce6fc61bc79bb2e9 > > Author: Alexander Duyck > > Date: Mon Apr 13 21:03:49 2015 +0930 > > > > virtio_ring: Update weak barriers to use dma_wmb/rmb > > That commit doesn't make any sense. dma_*mb() explicitly does _NOT_ > cover the smp_*mb() part. > > Again, look at the ARM definitions, the smp_*mb() primitives use the > inner coherence stuff, while the dma_*mb() primitives use the outer > coherent stuff. Does outer coherent imply inner coherent? > the *mb() primitives cover both. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/