Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:42:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:42:17 -0500 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([195.224.96.167]:39429 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:42:16 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:52:51 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev Message-ID: <20030307195251.A14559@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl on Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:50:18PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 844 Lines: 19 On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:50:18PM +0100, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: > > the prototype changes you did which make absolutely no sense > > to get into 2.5 now when the functions will disappear before 2.6. > > Maybe you are right. > But as I said, my goal is to give us a 32-bit dev_t. > It is not necessary to eliminate register_blkdev now, > or before 2.6, in order to reach that goal. > I agree completely that it should go away, and I moved it > in front of the function it is going to be merged with. Okay, and that part is fine with me, but please just leave the prototype as-iw now, okay? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/