Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:07:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:07:46 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:22792 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:07:45 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [RFC] one line fix in arch/i386/Kconfig Date: 7 Mar 2003 14:18:12 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: References: <20030307220337.5841.qmail@linuxmail.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2003 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1117 Lines: 32 Followup to: <20030307220337.5841.qmail@linuxmail.org> By author: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > Hi all, > this is the first time I post a patch to the list, > therefore I'm really not sure if it is correct, > even if it is just a 'one line patch' > > If I say that my cpu is not a PentiumIV why > he bothers me about "check for P4 thermal throttling interrupt." ? > Because you might be compiling a kernel for a more baseline CPU, say a 486, but still check for thermal throttle if it's present. > This patch show that option only if you select that kind of CPU. > > Is it correct ? Does it makes sense ? No. -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/