Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:07:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:07:40 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.188]:1745 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:07:34 -0500 To: Olivier Galibert Cc: Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone References: <200303020011.QAA13450@adam.yggdrasil.com> <20030301202617.A18142@kerberos.ncsl.nist.gov> <20030306161853.GD2781@zaurus.ucw.cz> <20030307121215.GA68353@dspnet.fr.eu.org> From: Olaf Dietsche Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 01:18:02 +0100 Message-ID: <874r6elnid.fsf@goat.bogus.local> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) XEmacs/21.4 (Military Intelligence, i386-debian-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 753 Lines: 12 Olivier Galibert writes: > sometimes interesting. Nice systems, like PRCS and bk, first commit > to a new branch (no update necessary obviously) then merge in the > mainline. As a side effect, they are Good with branches. Bk's main > quality over PRCS is the distribution. This lack is what makes PRCS > essentially unusable for serious open source projects. Otherwise > they're semantically the same. So, what you say is: add distribution to PRCS and you're done? Regards, Olaf. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/