Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:37:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:37:13 -0500 Received: from harpo.it.uu.se ([130.238.12.34]:56809 "EHLO harpo.it.uu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:37:03 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 01:36:45 +0100 (MET) From: Mikael Pettersson Message-Id: <200102210036.BAA02313@harpo.it.uu.se> To: mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.1-ac UP-APIC updates Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:00:53 -0500 (EST), Ingo Molnar wrote: >my major gripe right now is that we still have bug reports that say that >systems hang when using nmi_watchdog=1 and work if nmi_watchdog=0. >Changing the NMI watchdog to be 1 Hz will make these bugreports "Linux >hangs once a week" instead of a "Linux hangs after 1-2 hours", which is >clearly hiding things and making debugging harder. All reports I've seen have been for SMP kernels on MP machines using the IO-APIC to drive the watchdog. Are you saying there are also cases where UP boxes fail with nmi_watchdog non-zero? (My 1Hz change only affected the local APIC-driven watchdog which MP boxes normally don't use.) >(and driving kernel-profiling from the NMI interrupt is a short-term >patch, so there is just no point in going to 1 Hz right now just to go >back to 100 Hz a few days later.) Another "constructive" use of the perfctrs. Ok, this I can see wants a higher rate. How far in the future is this? I'm concerned that the conflicting uses of the perfctrs (watchdog, kernel profiling, my perfctr driver for user-space performance measurements) is going to require some low-level request/release API. >the rest of the changes are excellent - it's only the 100 Hz NMI issue i >have a problem with. Ok. Alan beat me to it for -ac20, so I'm not including a new patch now with the 1Hz bit backed out. Ingo, I guess this means the kernel profiling patch will have to "fix" the 1Hz thing by itself. /Mikael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/