Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:11:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:11:31 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:15313 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:11:30 -0500 Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 08:03:17 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20030308.080317.27972826.davem@redhat.com> To: torvalds@transmeta.com Cc: zippel@linux-m68k.org, david.lang@digitalinsight.com, hpa@zytor.com, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: <1047106664.22024.0.camel@rth.ninka.net> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 831 Lines: 23 From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 07:54:02 -0800 (PST) On 7 Mar 2003, David S. Miller wrote: > I agree with Roman, I see no reason why the libgcc > license could not be used. ... If you do the work, you get to impact the license. If you don't, you had better SHUT THE F*CK UP! Note how I used the word "could" not "should" or "must". Should I really SHUT THE F*CK UP as you suggest? I totally agree with your position about who gets to decide the license. I thought the issue was one of usability, not personal choice. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/