Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 15:58:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 15:58:24 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:51922 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 15:58:23 -0500 Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 12:50:24 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20030308.125024.44441125.davem@redhat.com> To: chas@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM] obselete some atm_vcc members From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <200303051547.h25FleGi006585@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> References: <200303051547.h25FleGi006585@locutus.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 910 Lines: 23 From: chas williams Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 10:47:40 -0500 it has been suggested that atm_vcc has redundant members with struct sock. this patch removes family, tx_inuse, rx_inuse, and recvq from atm_vcc in favor of sk->family, sk->wmem_alloc, sk->rmem_alloc, and sk->receive_queue (respectively). Applied, but Chas please build fresh patches in the future. This stuff was all against a tree which still had the atm_dev semaphore instead of the new spinlock. Therefore half of the patches rejected and I had to put these parts in by hand. I did it this time, but really this needs to be done by you. :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/