Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932721AbbLVKWA (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 05:22:00 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:34444 "EHLO mail-lf0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932679AbbLVKV5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 05:21:57 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 22/23] pci, acpi: Match PCI config space accessors against platfrom specific quirks. To: Gabriele Paoloni , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "hanjun.guo@linaro.org" , "Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com" , "okaya@codeaurora.org" , "jiang.liu@linux.intel.com" , "Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com" References: <1450278993-12664-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> <1450278993-12664-23-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> Cc: "robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com" , "mw@semihalf.com" , "Liviu.Dudau@arm.com" , "ddaney@caviumnetworks.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , Wangyijing , "Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com" , "msalter@redhat.com" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" , "jchandra@broadcom.com" , "jcm@redhat.com" From: Tomasz Nowicki Message-ID: <567923D2.2010202@semihalf.com> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:20:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1885 Lines: 54 On 21.12.2015 12:47, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > 2) In the quirk mechanism you proposed, I see that the callback function > allows to do some preparation work for the host bridge. For example in > Hisilicon hip05 case we would need to read some values from the ACPI > table (see acpi_pci_root_hisi_add() function in > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/3/426). > I am quite new to ACPI and I wonder if it is OK to add such "Packages" > to the PCI host bridge ACPI device...or maybe we need to declare a new > one...? I may miss sth so please correct me in that case. https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/3/426 shows that you need special handling for root->secondary.start bus number only, right? So how about creating special MCFG region only for . Like that: [0008] Base Address : [0002] Segment Group Number : [0001] Start Bus Number : secondary.start> [0001] End Bus Number : secondary.start> [0004] Reserved : 00000000 static const struct dmi_system_id hisi_quirk[] = { { .ident = "HiSi...", .matches = { DMI_MATCH(), }, }, { } }; static struct pci_ops hisi_ecam_pci_ops = { .map_bus = pci_mcfg_dev_base, .read = hisi_pcie_cfg_read, .write = hisi_pcie_cfg_write, }; DECLARE_ACPI_MCFG_FIXUP(hisi_quirk, &hisi_ecam_pci_ops, , ); With above code you can use your custom PCI config accessor only for that region. Let me know if that is not enough for you. Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/