Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755021AbbLVMDS (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 07:03:18 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55052 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753589AbbLVMDR (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 07:03:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 20:05:40 +0800 From: Minfei Huang To: Xunlei Pang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dyoung@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: Move some memembers and definitions within the scope of CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE Message-ID: <20151222120540.GA29636@dhcp-128-25.nay.redhat.com> References: <1450678154-12581-1-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com> <20151222104704.GA28313@dhcp-128-25.nay.redhat.com> <567936B7.5020702@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <567936B7.5020702@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1822 Lines: 49 On 12/22/15 at 07:40pm, Xunlei Pang wrote: > On 12/22/2015 at 06:47 PM, Minfei Huang wrote: > > On 12/21/15 at 02:09pm, Xunlei Pang wrote: > >> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h > > Hi, Xunlei. > > > > Following functions will be used only in kexec_file. Please wrap them in > > CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE. > > > > int __weak arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf, > > unsigned long buf_len); > > void * __weak arch_kexec_kernel_image_load(struct kimage *image); > > int __weak arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image); > > int __weak arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig(struct kimage *image, void *buf, > > unsigned long buf_len); > > int __weak arch_kexec_apply_relocations_add(const Elf_Ehdr *ehdr, > > Elf_Shdr *sechdrs, unsigned int relsec); > > int __weak arch_kexec_apply_relocations(const Elf_Ehdr *ehdr, Elf_Shdr *sechdrs, > > unsigned int relsec); > > Thanks for the comment. > > I noticed this as well, but seems for the function declarations we don't need do this, > since they don't consume the actual space. Yeah. I think it is better to fold above code as well, since there is no side effect. > > For example, in the include/linux/timekeeping.h > /* > * RTC specific > */ > extern bool timekeeping_rtc_skipsuspend(void); > extern bool timekeeping_rtc_skipresume(void); > > extern void timekeeping_inject_sleeptime64(struct timespec64 *delta); > > also not embraced by the corresponding macros. I think it is consistent of the construction to make code more clear. Thanks Minfei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/