Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753105AbbLVPLu (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:11:50 -0500 Received: from mail-oi0-f53.google.com ([209.85.218.53]:33243 "EHLO mail-oi0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752144AbbLVPLs (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:11:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1450792017-7120-1-git-send-email-djkurtz@chromium.org> References: <1450792017-7120-1-git-send-email-djkurtz@chromium.org> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 16:11:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: convert to arch_initcall From: Linus Walleij To: Daniel Kurtz , Grant Likely , Mark Brown , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Cc: Matthias Brugger , Yingjoe Chen , Hongzhou Yang , Fabio Estevam , Fabian Frederick , Maoguang Meng , Axel Lin , "open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" , open list , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 784 Lines: 20 On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > Move pinctrl initialization earlier in boot so that real devices can find > their pctldev without probe deferring. (...) > -module_init(mtk_pinctrl_init); > +arch_initcall(mtk_pinctrl_init); So I see why you're doing this (because of wanting to avoid nasty boot probe deferrals, right?) and I'm going to apply it, because the work with probe ordering is still in the works, but I'd like some general ARM people to come in with opinions. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/