Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:22:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:22:20 -0500 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:52230 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:22:19 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:28:10 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Davidsen To: Harald.Schaefer@gls-germany.com cc: Alan Cox , Thomas.Mieslinger@gls-germany.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ide-problem still with 2.4.21-pre5-ac1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1118 Lines: 26 On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 Harald.Schaefer@gls-germany.com wrote: > * 1. CHS value set by user (whatever user sets will be trusted) > * 2. LBA value from target drive (require new ATA feature) > * 3. LBA value from system BIOS (new one is OK, old one may break) > * 4. CHS value from system BIOS (traditional style) > > I think that the priority of LBA from BIOS has to be raised to 2 and the > priority of LBA from drive should be lowered to 3. > The mapping-problem only appreared with very new drives in some > brand-computers using a 240-head mapping from the bios. I think the chances of a drive knowing its own correct LBA info is far better than the BIOS getting it right. Many BIOS versions don't understand large drives. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/