Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:28:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:28:44 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:55052 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:28:44 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 14:36:53 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Alan Cox cc: Christoph Hellwig , Joel Becker , Greg KH , , , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] register_blkdev In-Reply-To: <1047166634.26807.50.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1060 Lines: 28 On 8 Mar 2003, Alan Cox wrote: > > No vendor I have spoken too intends to care what Linus thinks about it. > Linus tried this in 2.4. We all got together to create a numbering > repository instead of letting Linus do it. I was right, though. Look at how useless the fixed numbers are getting. I certainly agree that we'll need to open up the number space, but I really do think that the way to _manage_ it is something like what Greg pointed to - dynamic tols with "rules" on allocation, instead of the stupid static manual assignment thing. We're pretty close to it already. I thought some Linux vendors are already starting to pick up on the hotplugging tools, simply because there are no real alternatives. And once you do it that way, the static numbers are meaningless. And good riddance. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/