Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755429AbbLVQWo (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:22:44 -0500 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:40034 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755323AbbLVQWm (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:22:42 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] watchdog: Separate and maintain variables based on variable lifetime To: Damien Riegel , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck , Pratyush Anand , Hans de Goede , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1450645503-16661-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <1450645503-16661-3-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <20151221172815.GC12696@localhost> <5678A322.2010109@roeck-us.net> <20151222160907.GC6164@localhost> From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <567978D0.2060801@roeck-us.net> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:22:40 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151222160907.GC6164@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3646 Lines: 82 On 12/22/2015 08:09 AM, Damien Riegel wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:10:58PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 12/21/2015 09:28 AM, Damien Riegel wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 01:05:00PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> All variables required by the watchdog core to manage a watchdog are >>>> currently stored in struct watchdog_device. The lifetime of those >>>> variables is determined by the watchdog driver. However, the lifetime >>>> of variables used by the watchdog core differs from the lifetime of >>>> struct watchdog_device. To remedy this situation, watchdog drivers >>>> can implement ref and unref callbacks, to be used by the watchdog >>>> core to lock struct watchdog_device in memory. >>>> >>>> While this solves the immediate problem, it depends on watchdog drivers >>>> to actually implement the ref/unref callbacks. This is error prone, >>>> often not implemented in the first place, or not implemented correctly. >>>> >>>> To solve the problem without requiring driver support, split the variables >>>> in struct watchdog_device into two data structures - one for variables >>>> associated with the watchdog driver, one for variables associated with >>>> the watchdog core. With this approach, the watchdog core can keep track >>>> of its variable lifetime and no longer depends on ref/unref callbacks >>>> in the driver. As a side effect, some of the variables originally in >>>> struct watchdog_driver are now private to the watchdog core and no longer >>>> visible in watchdog drivers. >>>> >>>> The 'ref' and 'unref' callbacks in struct watchdog_driver are no longer >>>> used and marked as deprecated. >>> >>> Two comments below. It's great to see that unbinding a driver no longer >>> triggers a kernel panic. >>> >> It should not have caused a panic to start with, but the ref/unref functions >> for the most part were either not or wrongly implemented. Not really >> surprising - it took me a while to understand the problem. > > I tested on a driver which did not implement ref/unref. When ping is > called, it tries to dereference a freed 'struct watchdog_device' in > watchdog_get_drvdata, leading to a panic. > Yes, that will happen. Problem here is that the driver is buggy - pretty much all drivers which dynamically allocate struct watchdog_device have this problem. This is the ultimate reason for coming up with this patch. >> >> [ ... ] >> >>>> >>>> /* >>>> + * struct _watchdog_device - watchdog core internal data >>> >>> Think it should be /**. Anyway, I find it confusing to have both >>> _watchdog_device and watchdog_device, but I can't think of a better >>> name right now. >> >> I renamed the data structure to watchdog_data and moved it into watchdog_dev.c >> since it is only used there. No '**', though, because it is not a published >> API, but just an internal data structure. >> >> I also renamed the matching variable name to 'wd_data' (from '_wdd'). > > Okay. Also, why didn't you use the explicit type for 'wdd_data' in > 'struct watchdog_device' instead of a void*? > This is to hide the data type, since the structure is not exported to drivers. I could pre-declare the structure with 'struct watchdog_data;', but then I'd have to use a different structure name (watchdog_cdev_data, maybe, or watchdog_core_data) to make it less generic. Any opinion ? Would that be better / preferred ? I am 50/50 about it. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/