Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751465AbbLWQhp (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:37:45 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:36119 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750969AbbLWQhk (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:37:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:37:38 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20151223.113738.1936313727845564774.davem@davemloft.net> To: henri.roosen@ginzinger.com Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, f.fainelli@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] phy: micrel: Fix finding PHY properties in MAC node for KSZ9031. From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <567A572A.4030207@ginzinger.com> References: <20151222110634.GC2373@lunn.ch> <20151222.171444.1073714139867888727.davem@davemloft.net> <567A572A.4030207@ginzinger.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.6 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Wed, 23 Dec 2015 08:37:40 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1468 Lines: 39 From: Henri Roosen Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:11:22 +0100 > On 12/22/2015 11:14 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Andrew Lunn >> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:06:34 +0100 >> >>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:58:40AM +0100, Henri Roosen wrote: >>>> Commit 651df2183543 ("phy: micrel: Fix finding PHY properties in MAC >>>> node.") only fixes finding PHY properties in MAC node for >>>> KSZ9021. This >>>> commit applies the same fix for KSZ9031. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Henri Roosen >>> >>> Fixes: 8b63ec1837fa ("phylib: Make PHYs children of their MDIO bus, >>> not the bus' parent.") >>> >>> Acked-by: Andrew Lunn >> >> This does not apply cleanly to any of my trees. > > David, does the original patch not apply cleanly or is your comment > only > on the message from Andrew? > > Else please let me know what is wrong with the original patch. I've > tested it applies cleanly to v4.4-rc6 and to v4.3. Your original patch did not apply cleanly. All patches must be against either my 'net' or 'net-next' trees. And you must explicitly state what tree your patch is against and therefore which tree you expect me to apply it too. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/