Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756682AbbLWTNo (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2015 14:13:44 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:41200 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752441AbbLWTNl (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2015 14:13:41 -0500 Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:13:38 -0800 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Chao Yu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: call f2fs_balance_fs only when node was changed Message-ID: <20151223191338.GD30505@jaegeuk.local> References: <1450832388-29118-1-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <1450832388-29118-4-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <010b01d13d66$f85f2ac0$e91d8040$@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <010b01d13d66$f85f2ac0$e91d8040$@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2533 Lines: 84 Hi Chao, On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 05:46:59PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > Hi Jaegeuk, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 9:00 AM > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; > > linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > Cc: Jaegeuk Kim > > Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/4] f2fs: call f2fs_balance_fs only when node was changed > > > > If user tries to update or read data, we don't need to call f2fs_balance_fs > > which triggers f2fs_gc, which increases unnecessary long latency. > > One missing case is get_data_block_dio, how about also covering it based on > following patch? It makes sense. I'll submit v2. Thanks, > > > >From 7175efac7473e7a04285055c69edfb7432f8ca4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Chao Yu > Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:11:43 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: reduce covered region of sbi->cp_rwsem in > f2fs_map_blocks > > Only cover sbi->cp_rwsem on one dnode page's allocation and modification > instead of multiple's in f2fs_map_blocks, it can reduce the covered region > of cp_rwsem, then we can avoid potential long time delay for concurrent > checkpointer. > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > --- > fs/f2fs/data.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c > index 8f8f8b0..3c83b16 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c > @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct f2fs_map_blocks *map, > } > > if (create) > - f2fs_lock_op(F2FS_I_SB(inode)); > + f2fs_lock_op(sbi); > > /* When reading holes, we need its node page */ > set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0); > @@ -651,6 +651,11 @@ get_next: > allocated = false; > f2fs_put_dnode(&dn); > > + if (create) { > + f2fs_unlock_op(sbi); > + f2fs_lock_op(sbi); > + } > + > set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0); > err = get_dnode_of_data(&dn, pgofs, mode); > if (err) { > @@ -706,7 +711,7 @@ put_out: > f2fs_put_dnode(&dn); > unlock_out: > if (create) > - f2fs_unlock_op(F2FS_I_SB(inode)); > + f2fs_unlock_op(sbi); > out: > trace_f2fs_map_blocks(inode, map, err); > return err; > -- > 2.6.3 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/