Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 04:30:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 04:30:22 -0500 Received: from tag.witbe.net ([81.88.96.48]:22279 "EHLO tag.witbe.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 04:30:22 -0500 From: "Paul Rolland" To: "'Paul Larson'" , "'Rusty Lynch'" Cc: "'lkml'" Subject: Re: Available watchdog test cases Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 10:40:58 +0100 Message-ID: <008501c2e61f$fdd0a800$2101a8c0@witbe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 In-Reply-To: <1046880939.26974.21.camel@plars> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 910 Lines: 25 Just a quick question : is there an easy to force the kernel to Oops, to make sure that the watchdog will even be working under such conditions ? I know people are all trying to avoid Oops... but I think the testplan should include that too... Regards, Paul > On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 15:04, Rusty Lynch wrote: > > The test cases that I have been using for testing my > watchdog work are > > available at > > http://www.stinkycat.com/patches/watchdog_stuff/watchdog_test.tar.gz > > > > The test are for both the legacy (well, current) /dev/watchdog > > interface and my proposed sysfs based interface. > Thanks a bunch Rusty, I'll take a look at them for LTP. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/