Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753453AbbLZQRn (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:17:43 -0500 Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com ([209.85.218.43]:34794 "EHLO mail-oi0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751240AbbLZQRl (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:17:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 19:17:41 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: GPIO-driven RTS on TI hardware with 8250_omap driver From: =?UTF-8?B?0JjQu9GM0Y/RgSDQk9Cw0YHQsNC90L7Qsg==?= To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2692 Lines: 52 Hello. We are upgrading to the 4.1.x kernel for our smart metering appliance project, which is based on TI's Sitara hardware (AM335x SoC), and I decided to switch from omap-serial legacy driver to the newer 8250-based one. It marginally increases throughput efficiency, CPU cycle wise, among other goodies, but I'm looking to implement a rather important feature that is present in the legacy driver, but the newer one is lacking. Namely, our project makes use of RS232<->RS485 converters, which in turn need to consume RTS signals to switch between Rx and Tx modes at the RS485 side, due to the bus variant we use being half-duplex. However, the already manufactured hardware is already designed to make the use of certain pins to take the RTS signal from, which can only be configured as GPIO for that purpose (in other words, no "native" UART RTS) - and basically redesigning the h/w configuration now is definitely out of question. The omap-serial driver already provides FDT options for that, named "rts-gpio", "rs485-rts-active-high" etc. As far as I could ascertain, the 8250_omap driver (as well as the 8250 framework itself) at the moment lacks the means to make use of GPIO pins for that purpose. While trying to implement it myself, I noticed that the legacy driver has it made in a comparably straightforward approach, via dispatching the code to switch the pin in its .start_tx and .stop_tx handlers, and some timing adjustments. Unfortunately, the situation with 8250-based drivers is different - the aforementioned handlers are provided by the 8250_core module and are common for all drivers within the framework. At first, I thought that implementing such feature for the 8250 framework itself sounds like a good idea, but after reading this particular post: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-July/271377.html I decided to comply with the point of view specified there. However, I'm not that familiar with the 8250 framework internals (or serial internals at all, for that matter), and my time is quite short, so I would appreciate much any useful directions on how to do it hardware-specific style, which functions/structs/handlers to use, etc. Of particular interest is the following part: > I don't care whether the drive does it via serial_out magic or a more explicit hook but it doesn't belong here in core code. Any ideas/clarifications on what might be meant on that part? Regards, Ilyas G. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/