Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 12:37:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 12:37:30 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:8107 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 12:37:27 -0500 Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 09:48:00 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Zack Brown cc: Roman Zippel , "Eric W. Biederman" , Linus Torvalds , Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone Message-ID: <18320000.1047232078@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <20030309172045.GP4170@renegade> References:

<8200000.1047228943@[10.10.2.4]> <20030309172045.GP4170@renegade> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 811 Lines: 19 >> I think it's possible to get 90% of the functionality that most of us >> (or at least I) want without the distributed stuff. If that's 10% of >> the effort, would be really nice to have the auto-merging type of >> functionality at least. > >> If I'm missing something fundamental here, it wouldn't suprise me ;-) > > I think the fundamental thing you're missing is that Linus doesn't want it. ;-) Depends what your goal is ;-) I'm not on a holy quest to stop Linus using Bitkeeper .... I'm just trying to make the non-Bitkeeper users' life a little easier. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/