Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:51:59 +0100
From: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] null_blk: don't enable irqs when in irq
Message-ID: <20151228195159.GA5330@debian>
References: <1451053594-12188-1-git-send-email-rabin@rab.in>
 <567E1180.8070004@fb.com>
 <568184E8.1080801@fb.com>
 <20151228190715.GA20883@debian>
 <56818955.8030401@fb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56818955.8030401@fb.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 842
Lines: 25

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 12:11:17PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/28/2015 12:07 PM, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 11:52:24AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>Something like this should work, can you test it?
> >
> >Spits out a bunch of the following.  It's this assertion:
> >
> >static inline void queue_lockdep_assert_held(struct request_queue *q)
> >{
> >	if (q->queue_lock)
> >		lockdep_assert_held(q->queue_lock);
> >}
> 
> Ah right, we clear the stopped flag. This one should be better.

Yes, this one appears to work fine.

 Tested-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/