Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 18:49:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 18:49:01 -0500 Received: from smtp09.iddeo.es ([62.81.186.19]:46231 "EHLO smtp09.retemail.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 18:48:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 00:59:34 +0100 From: "J.A. Magallon" To: Dave Jones Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fwd: struct inode size reduction. Message-ID: <20030309235934.GA3962@werewolf.able.es> References: <20030309135402.GB32107@suse.de> <20030309224552.GA3047@werewolf.able.es> <20030310001129.GB13869@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT In-Reply-To: <20030310001129.GB13869@suse.de>; from davej@codemonkey.org.uk on Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 01:11:29 +0100 X-Mailer: Balsa 2.0.9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1005 Lines: 20 On 03.10, Dave Jones wrote: > On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:45:52PM +0100, J.A. Magallon wrote: > > > If you do not need gcc-2.95 support, you can use anonymous unions: > > I have tested on gcc-3.0, 3.2.2, RH gcc-2.96-98, and 2.95.2. Only 2.95.2 > > fails. > > What about the magick ancient version that sparc uses That was my point, I do not know if some arch still requires 2.95 in 2.6. For 2.4, it states 2.95.3 as minimun. There is not anything newer for sparc ? Curious... -- J.A. Magallon \ Software is like sex: werewolf.able.es \ It's better when it's free Mandrake Linux release 9.1 (Cooker) for i586 Linux 2.4.21-pre5-jam0 (gcc 3.2.2 (Mandrake Linux 9.1 3.2.2-3mdk)) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/