Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:02:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:02:07 -0500 Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk ([193.162.159.95]:33033 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:02:05 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 20:12:45 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Roman Zippel Cc: Sam Ravnborg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig update Message-ID: <20030310191244.GA1715@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: Roman Zippel , Sam Ravnborg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030309190103.GA1170@mars.ravnborg.org> <20030309193439.GA15837@mars.ravnborg.org> <20030309211518.GA18087@mars.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 871 Lines: 20 On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 11:00:02AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > verbose mode. If you skip the oldconfig step, the config tool is called > anyway and checks the configuration and only asks as necessary. The same > mode could be used for oldconfig, but I didn't want to change the > behaviour needlessly. The reason to respond is that all the output from conf looks useless. What is the usage of conf being so verbose? If it is required then keep it. But making conf that verbose only because configure was that verbose . There is no point in that. Not a needlessly change, but more in the area - it was about time.. Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/