Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752303AbcCBGqj (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 01:46:39 -0500 Received: from thoth.sbs.de ([192.35.17.2]:53067 "EHLO thoth.sbs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750738AbcCBGqg (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 01:46:36 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kvm: Make KVM DF intercept configurable To: Borislav Petkov , Paolo Bonzini References: <20160301192822.GD22677@pd.tnic> <56D6059D.5050606@redhat.com> <20160301224132.GE22677@pd.tnic> Cc: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmcgUsO2ZGVs?= , Andy Lutomirski , x86-ml , kvm ML , lkml From: Jan Kiszka Message-ID: <56D68C21.7080602@siemens.com> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 07:45:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160301224132.GE22677@pd.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1438 Lines: 39 On 2016-03-01 23:41, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:11:57PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> I just use QEMU's binary translation mode to debug this kind of code (-d >> in_asm is useful and relatively compact (because it only shows loops >> once), > > Ha, I had forgotten about "in_asm"! Thanks for reminding me, that's a > really cool feature I'm going to use. With it I see: > > ---------------- > IN: > 0x0000000001000000: mov 0xffffffff81cba1f8,%rsp > 0x0000000001000008: callq 0x10001a9 > > ---------------- > > Now, it is obvious that 0xffffffff81cba1f8 is not mapped yet and we're > running from physical addresses. The DF tracepoint shows, in addition, > the previous exception vector causing the DF and I think that's useful. > As an additional debugging aid. Oh, and that doesn't need ept=0 and runs > at full speed. > >> or alternatively ept=0. But perhaps... why not. :) It's not like it >> adds overhead. > > Yeah, it is off by default and doesn't hurt anyone. And the diff size > is ok, IMHO. Lemme code the Intel side too and see how the whole thing > turns out. To make this a serious debug feature, we should consider trapping all exceptions on request (and reinjecting the unhandled ones). Not sure right now, though, if that comes with more complications than the simple #DF case. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux