Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754421AbcCBJHx (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 04:07:53 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:49216 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753509AbcCBJHs (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 04:07:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:07:42 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Paolo Bonzini , =?utf-8?B?SsO2cmcgUsO2ZGVs?= , Andy Lutomirski , x86-ml , kvm ML , lkml Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kvm: Make KVM DF intercept configurable Message-ID: <20160302090742.GA16954@pd.tnic> References: <20160301192822.GD22677@pd.tnic> <56D6059D.5050606@redhat.com> <20160301224132.GE22677@pd.tnic> <56D68C21.7080602@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56D68C21.7080602@siemens.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 491 Lines: 16 On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:45:53AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: > To make this a serious debug feature, we should consider trapping all > exceptions on request (and reinjecting the unhandled ones). Not sure > right now, though, if that comes with more complications than the simple > #DF case. I can certainly try... Something like "intercept=,,..." or so. Let me see how ugly it can get... Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.