Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754373AbcCBJLv (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 04:11:51 -0500 Received: from mail-vk0-f45.google.com ([209.85.213.45]:34031 "EHLO mail-vk0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754166AbcCBJLs (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 04:11:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:11:46 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] usbhid: Fix lockdep unannotated irqs-off warning From: Sedat Dilek To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Alan Stern , Steven Rostedt , Tejun Heo , Lai Jiangshan , Benjamin Tissoires , Paul McKenney , Andy Lutomirski , LKML , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 841 Lines: 36 On 3/2/16, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier >> *barr) >> { >> struct worker *worker = NULL; >> struct worker_pool *pool; >> struct pool_workqueue *pwq; >> >> might_sleep(); >> >> local_irq_disable(); >> pool = get_work_pool(work); >> if (!pool) { >> local_irq_enable(); >> return false; >> } >> >> spin_lock(&pool->lock); <--- XXX: spin_lock_irq() ??? > > No, this is fine. IRQs are unconditionally disabled a few lines above. > You are right, I tried with a substitution and that does not matter. What about passing flags to local_irq_XXX? And how do I do that? - Sedat - > -- > Jiri Kosina > SUSE Labs > >