Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754539AbcCBJSI (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 04:18:08 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:35880 "EHLO mail-wm0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754461AbcCBJSB (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 04:18:01 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kvm: Make KVM DF intercept configurable To: Borislav Petkov , Jan Kiszka References: <20160301192822.GD22677@pd.tnic> <56D6059D.5050606@redhat.com> <20160301224132.GE22677@pd.tnic> <56D68C21.7080602@siemens.com> <20160302090742.GA16954@pd.tnic> Cc: =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmcgUsO2ZGVs?= , Andy Lutomirski , x86-ml , kvm ML , lkml From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <56D6AFC4.9060708@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:17:56 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160302090742.GA16954@pd.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 453 Lines: 13 On 02/03/2016 10:07, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> > To make this a serious debug feature, we should consider trapping all >> > exceptions on request (and reinjecting the unhandled ones). Not sure >> > right now, though, if that comes with more complications than the simple >> > #DF case. > I can certainly try... Something like "intercept=,,..." > or so. Let me see how ugly it can get... For kernel folks, a bit mask can do. :) Paolo