Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 16:36:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 16:35:59 -0500 Received: from 66-122-194-202.ded.pacbell.net ([66.122.194.202]:1005 "HELO mail.keyresearch.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 16:35:56 -0500 Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [RFC] Improved inode number allocation for HTree From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" To: Daniel Phillips Cc: John Bradford , ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger@clusterfs.com, chrisl@vmware.com, bzzz@tmi.comex.ru In-Reply-To: <20030310212953.57F2310435B@mx12.arcor-online.net> References: <200303102104.h2AL43iZ000875@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> <20030310212953.57F2310435B@mx12.arcor-online.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1047332834.11339.3.camel@serpentine.internal.keyresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 10 Mar 2003 13:47:14 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 591 Lines: 18 On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 13:33, Daniel Phillips wrote: > It sounds practical. Why stop there? Why start? Who actually uses atime for anything at all, other than the tiny number of shops that care about moving untouched files to tertiary storage? Surely if you want to heap someone else's plate with work, you should offer a reason why :-)