Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 18:10:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 18:10:17 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:54545 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 18:10:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:20:57 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: Patrick Mochel , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: SWSUSP Discontiguous pagedir patch Message-ID: <20030310232057.GC8555@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20030307202759.GA2447@elf.ucw.cz> <20030310192300.GC11310@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <1047334626.6245.30.camel@laptop-linux.cunninghams> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1047334626.6245.30.camel@laptop-linux.cunninghams> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 746 Lines: 20 Hi! > > Do you think you can suspend with 90% memory kmalloc()-ed? > > Is that a fair question? Would 90% of memory ever be kmalloced? If the > question is can you suspend with 90% of memory used, then I can answer > yes. I do it all the time under the code I'm porting to 2.5. (Nearly > there, by the way). No, it was not fair question, not at all. If he'd replied with yes, I'd tell him I don't believe that ;-). Pavel -- Horseback riding is like software... ...vgf orggre jura vgf serr. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/