Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753737AbcCBVYz (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 16:24:55 -0500 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:11949 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752522AbcCBVYy (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 16:24:54 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ubifs: Add logging functions for ubifs_msg, ubifs_err and ubifs_warn To: Joe Perches References: <1456944509.4044.27.camel@nod.at> <1456945122.4044.35.camel@perches.com> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Hunter , Artem Bityutskiy From: Richard Weinberger Message-ID: <56D75A1F.5070304@nod.at> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:24:47 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1456945122.4044.35.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2325 Lines: 72 Joe, Am 02.03.2016 um 19:58 schrieb Joe Perches: > On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 19:46 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am 02.03.2016 7:19 nachm. schrieb Joe Perches : >>> On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 12:21 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: >>>> The existing logging macros are fairly large and converting the >>>> macros to functions make the object code smaller. >>> Artem and Adrian are the nominal maintainers for ubifs. >>> >>> Artem last had a sign-off on a ubifs patch 6 months ago and >>> Adrian's last one was over 3 years ago. >>> >>> Is there an expected ack/nack/applied handling time for a >>> ubifs patch like this? >>> >>> Should this patch go to someone else? >>> >>> Should the MAINTAINERS entry for ubifs be changed to orphan? >> No need to panic. I take care of the patch. :) > > No worries, I'm calm. But if you're taking care of the patch > and not the nominal maintainers, likely the MAINTAINERS entry > should be updated. > > Presumably the equivalent ubi patch will be handled in the > same fashion, > > For drivers/mtd/ubi, Artem is also a nominal maintainer, but > last signed a patch in 2014. > > Likely the MAINTAINERS entry for UBI should be updated too. > > Maybe something like: > --- > MAINTAINERS | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 81302e4..927557c 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -11266,8 +11266,7 @@ S: Maintained > F: drivers/scsi/u14-34f.c > > UBI FILE SYSTEM (UBIFS) > -M: Artem Bityutskiy > -M: Adrian Hunter > +M: Richard Weinberger I can be the official patch monkey for UBIFS. Especial as the git tree is the same as for UBI. But I definitely want to keep Artem. He gives very valuable input and knows UBIFS much better than I do. > L: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org > T: git git://git.infradead.org/ubifs-2.6.git > W: http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.html > @@ -11350,7 +11349,6 @@ F: Documentation/scsi/ufs.txt > F: drivers/scsi/ufs/ > > UNSORTED BLOCK IMAGES (UBI) > -M: Artem Bityutskiy > M: Richard Weinberger > W: http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/ > L: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Same here. Artem has to stay. Thanks, //richard