Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756361AbcCCDVC (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:21:02 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49473 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753281AbcCCDVA (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:21:00 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 21:20:58 -0600 From: Josh Poimboeuf To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu , Adrian Hunter , Michael Ellerman , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] objtool: Support CROSS_COMPILE Message-ID: <20160303032058.GA10338@treble.redhat.com> References: <20160303092134.7c750589@canb.auug.org.au> <55b63eefc347f1bb28573f972d8d1adbf1f1c31d.1456962210.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com> <20160303134314.7098f033@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160303134314.7098f033@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1301 Lines: 39 On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:43:14PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Josh, > > Just a couple of quick comments ... > > On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 18:39:37 -0600 Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > > diff --git a/tools/objtool/Makefile b/tools/objtool/Makefile > > index c4f0713..e4a6bd5 100644 > > --- a/tools/objtool/Makefile > > +++ b/tools/objtool/Makefile > > I was wondering if this would be more appropriate in scripts/objtool > since it is used during the building of the kernel. Or does it have a > wider use? Yeah, it was actually in the scripts/ dir in earlier revisions of the patch set, for that very reason. However, Ingo pointed out that it could be useful beyond the kernel, so we graduated it to a "tool". > > @@ -7,13 +7,19 @@ ARCH := x86 > > endif > > endif > > > > +# always use the host compiler > > +CC = gcc > > We have HOSTCC with its associated HOSTCFLAGS etc ... I am not sure if > that is more appropriate (but it does take care of people using clang). The "tools" are almost completely separate from the rest of the kernel. They have their own scaled-down version of kbuild, which doesn't have HOSTCC. But yeah, we might eventually need to copy some of the host compilation infrastructure from scripts/Makefile.host over to the tools/ side. -- Josh